- Creator reported by AA
- Anthropic
- AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2
- 58
- Context reported by AA
- 1M
- AA cost per task (USD)
- $5.98

October 18, 2026 AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 capture; best tested configuration per model version. Explains Elo, LLM Stats and AA index differences.
Use only the displayed AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 from the official page captured on 2026-10-18. Keep the highest-scoring tested configuration per model version, preserving effort, fallback and version identifiers. Exclude incomplete scores marked with asterisks. Preserve source order for displayed integer ties without asserting statistical superiority; include all cutoff ties. Positions refer to this selection, not AA’s all-configuration ranks. Task cost never affects order and missing costs are not zero. This English-text index is distinct from GDPval-AA Elo, AA-Briefcase Elo and Arena preference ratings. Underlying evaluations were not rerun.
References: 4. Page edits do not imply that the underlying data is newer. AI assisted in producing this content; verification status is shown above.
This edition captures the Artificial Analysis (AA) Intelligence Index v4.3.2 table on October 18, 2026. It uses that index alone for ordering and keeps the highest-scoring tested configuration per model version. Effort and fallback settings remain in each name. Separate model versions stay separate. This is a dated capture, not a final result for the whole month.
Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) leads this selection at a displayed 58. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) and Muse Wonder Full (max) show 56. Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback), GPT-6 Astra (max) and Gemini 4 Argon (high) show 53. Equal displayed integers do not establish equality at full precision or statistical significance. Source order breaks display ties without asserting superiority.
Check the complete metric name. AA Intelligence Index is a composite index. AA’s GDPval-AA and AA-Briefcase can instead use Elo scales; GDPval-AA v2.1 currently anchors DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) at 1600. Arena text preference ratings use a separate pairwise-comparison scale and baseline. These ratings cannot be compared with 58 index points, a historical 59.6 LLM Stats score, or a 93% benchmark result. No simple division converts one into another.
Our editorial recommendation is to fix one source and metric for a monthly capability series, then consult task evaluations, human preference and cost separately. The current AA categories are Agents 30%, Coding 20%, Scientific Reasoning 20% and General 30%. Its scope is primarily English text. Chinese writing, vision, speech and actual business performance need separate evaluation.
Effort settings and fallback behavior are part of the tested configuration. Cost per Task is AA’s reported USD per benchmark task, not an API rate per million tokens or a subscription price. Missing values remain unreported, not zero. Deduplication prevents repeated effort variants from dominating the list; row positions are therefore not the raw ranks on AA’s all-configuration table. These are not necessarily vendors’ default settings. Preview models and models without displayed pricing may be included; inclusion does not establish universal availability.
No sign-in required. Feedback is reviewed before any content is changed. Limit: 5 per day.
The sole numeric source. Keep the best tested configuration per model version and source order for displayed ties. Captured at 2026-10-18T14:30:23.160Z; benchmarks were not independently rerun. Names, creators, context and task costs come from this same table.
Explains the current AA index, scope and version changes; does not substantiate historical scores.
The August and September articles preserve LLM Stats page captures, not AA scores. The April article lacked independent historical evidence, and its scores have been withdrawn. Comparing its old numbers or September’s 59.6 with this edition’s 58 cannot establish a capability decline. Source, methodology version, configuration and selection scope must match before showing changes across editions.
AnyRank transcribes published results rather than rerunning AA’s benchmarks. The extracted table, capture time and checksum accompany this edition. Future captures should be new records, not replacements for this one.
| Rank | Model and tested configuration | Creator reported by AA | AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | Context reported by AA | AA cost per task (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) | Anthropic | 58 | 1M | $5.98 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback) | Anthropic | 56 | 1M | $5.46 |
| 3 | Muse Wonder Full (max) | Meta | 56 | 1M | Not reported |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) | Anthropic | 53 | 1M | $7.63 |
| 5 | GPT-6 Astra (max) | OpenAI | 53 | 1M | $3.26 |
| 6 | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | 53 | 1M | $1.99 | |
| 7 | Muse Wonder (max) | Meta | 52 | 1.05M | $4.52 |
| 8 | GPT-6.1 Sol (max) | OpenAI | 52 | 1M | $0.72 |
| 9 | Muse Spark 1.3 (max) | Meta | 48 | 1M | $1.60 |
| 10 | Grok 4.7 (xhigh) | SpaceXAI | 46 | 500k | $3.74 |
| 11 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi | 46 | 1M | $0.13 |
| 12 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Alibaba | 45 | 984k | $5.41 |
| 13 | GLM-5.3 (max) | Z AI | 45 | 1M | $2.01 |
| 14 | Step 5 Preview | StepFun | 44 | 1M | $1.03 |
| 15 | Kimi K3 (max) | Kimi | 44 | 1.05M | $2.00 |
| 16 | Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) | Anthropic | 43 | 1M | $0.21 |
| 17 | GPT-5.6 Terra (max) | OpenAI | 42 | 1M | $1.40 |
| 18 | GLM-5.3-Flash | Z AI | 42 | 1M | $0.28 |
| 19 | Ling 3.1 Flash | InclusionAI | 41 | 1M | $1.00 |
| 20 | Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) | 41 | 1M | $1.24 |
A separate task evaluation, not the Intelligence Index; its Elo is not interchangeable with index scores.
Explains the scale of Arena pairwise ratings; methodological context, not this ranking’s sort metric.
Rank changes are shown only for verified data editions with the same metric, scope and methodology.
Comments